The Central Committee for Conscientious Objectors (CCCO)
Advice for Conscientious Objectors in the Armed Forces
 

Contents

CO Regulations

Acrobat Version

GI Rights Publications

  Navigation Bar: See text links below

The Definition of Force

Many COs make the mistake of saying simply that they are against all use of force when they answer the "force" question. This makes it easy for a clever Investigating Officer to catch them being inconsistent or to confuse them. The reason is simple: in the required question, "force" is never defined. So when you say you're against all use of force, you may mean military force or violence. But an Investigating Officer can trip you up by using "force" to mean the force you would use to hold someone back from hurting another person.

The dictionary defines "force" in a great many ways--ranging from the power you would use to move a billiard ball to the use of bombs, tanks, and military troops. So it's important when you talk about the use of force to be clear what kind of force you mean.

It's also important to remember that the courts have said the only use of force you have to object to is military force. Your common sense tells you that there's a difference between war and, say, defending yourself if someone assaults you in a bar. And the courts agree. 1


1. Courts on force: Gillette v US , 401 US 437 (1971); US v Purvis , 403 F.2d 555 (2d Cir. 1968)


Go to next page

Contents CO Regulations Acrobat Version
Ordering Information
GI Rights Hotline CCCO
GI Rights Publications
Central Committee for Conscientious Objectors
(510) 465-1617 Fax (510) 465-2459
405 14th St. #205
Oakland,CA 94612
girights@objector.org